Skip to main content
מנדלבוים, גור, ויצמן-גור — לוגו

Guide to Contributory Negligence in Tort Claims

Understanding Damages Reduction, Comparative Negligence, and Their Impact on Your Legal Rights

Leave your details — we’ll get back to you

We’ll respond within 24 hours

What is Contributory Negligence and Why Does It Change Everything in a Tort Claim?

When you are injured in a car accident, work accident, or as a result of public negligence, you are entitled to sue the responsible party for the damages you have suffered. However, in the real world of law, the picture is far from black and white. In many cases, not only is the defendant responsible for the accident — the injured party themselves may bear some responsibility for what happened. This is the situation known as contributory negligence (Comparative Negligence).

Contributory negligence is a legal principle holding that if the injured party contributed to causing or exacerbating the damage, their compensation will be reduced accordingly. In other words, if the injured party was also negligent, the court will reduce their compensation according to the percentage of their fault. This is a fundamental principle in Israeli tort law, and it directly and materially affects the amount you will receive at the end of the proceedings.

When you file a tort claim, it is important that you understand how contributory negligence works, what factors influence its determination, and how you can protect yourself from unjust reductions. Mandelboim, Gor, Vitsman-Gor and Co., Law Offices, which specializes in representing claimants in tort matters since 2008, deals with this issue every day. On this page, we will guide you through everything you need to know about contributory negligence and damages reduction.

How Does Contributory Negligence Work in Israel?

In Israel, the principle of contributory negligence is applied in accordance with the Tort Law (Liability for Injury). This means that if the court determines that the injured party had a part in causing or exacerbating the damage, their compensation will be reduced proportionally to the percentage of their fault.

A simple example: You are driving in a car accident. The other driver ran a red light and caused the accident. However, in the legal investigation, it emerges that you were also not sufficiently aware of your surroundings and could have avoided the accident if you had been more careful. The court may determine that you are responsible for 20% of the damage, and the other driver is responsible for 80%. Accordingly, your compensation will be reduced by 20%.

This not only changes the final amount — it also changes the negotiation with the defendant's insurance company. When the insurance company knows there is a chance that the injured party will be proven to have contributory negligence, it uses this as leverage in discussions. If you are not prepared, you may end up accepting an amount far less than what you are entitled to.

Factors Affecting the Determination of Contributory Negligence

The court does not decide on contributory negligence arbitrarily. There are legal criteria that guide the decision:

  • The injured party's conduct at the time of the accident: Was the injured party careful? Were they aware of the danger? Did they take reasonable steps to avoid the damage?
  • Compliance with traffic laws or applicable laws: If the injured party violated a law (for example, drove without a seatbelt, or crossed a red light), this may indicate contributory negligence.
  • Environmental conditions: Were there difficult road conditions, limited visibility, or severe weather that should have affected the injured party's behavior?
  • The specific circumstances of the case: Every case is unique. The court examines all the details — speed, distance, reaction time, and more.
  • Expert opinions: In serious claims, expert opinions are often used (traffic engineer, physician, etc.) to determine whether the injured party was negligent.

It is important to emphasize: the burden of proof that the injured party had contributory negligence rests with the defendant (or their insurance company). However, if the defendant presents compelling evidence, the court will require the injured party to defend themselves.

Reduction of Compensation in Tort Claims — How It Works in Practice

When discussing reduction of compensation in the context of contributory negligence, it is important to understand that this is not an arbitrary process. The court calculates compensation in two stages:

First Stage: Determination of the total compensation amount for damages (bodily injury, medical expenses, loss of income, pain and suffering, etc.).

Second Stage: Reduction of the amount in accordance with the percentage of the plaintiff's fault.

Practical example: Suppose the court determines that you are entitled to compensation of 500,000 shekels, but finds that you have contributory negligence of 25%. Your final compensation will be 375,000 shekels (500,000 minus 25%).

However, the important point is this: this reduction is not automatic. It depends on evidence, strong legal arguments, and the quality of your legal representation. If your attorney is not prepared to challenge claims of contributory negligence, you may receive a reduction greater than what is justified.

This is why it is important that you work with an attorney experienced in tort claims. Mandelbaum, Gor, Witzman-Gor and Co. represents claimants only in tort matters — this means that all our expertise is dedicated to protecting your rights and reducing unjust reductions.

Joint Negligence in Tort Claims — What It Is and How It Differs from Contributory Negligence?

Often, the terms contributory negligence and joint negligence are used interchangeably, but there is a significant difference between them.

Joint negligence refers to a situation in which there are two or more defendants, and each is liable in part for the damage. For example: a traffic accident in which both driver A and driver B contributed to the accident. Accordingly, both are liable — driver A for 60% and driver B for 40%. In this scenario, as a plaintiff, you can sue both, but your compensation will be reduced according to your percentage of fault, not that of the defendants.

Contributory negligence, on the other hand, refers to the fault of the plaintiff themselves. It is a situation in which the plaintiff contributed to the causing or aggravation of the damage.

In practice, in complex cases, there may be both joint negligence (among the defendants) and contributory negligence (of the plaintiff). In such a scenario, compensation is reduced according to both factors.

Typical Cases of Contributory Negligence in Tort Claims

Comparison Table: Different Scenarios of Contributory Negligence and Their Impact on Compensation

ScenarioPercentage of Contributory NegligenceBase CompensationCompensation After ReductionNotes
Driver injured in accident who was careful and complied with traffic laws0%₪500,000₪500,000No reduction; injured party receives full compensation
Driver injured, but was not careful or committed a minor violation15–20%₪500,000₪400,000–₪425,000Minor reduction; for example: driver was not aware of surroundings
Driver injured who committed a significant violation (e.g., driving without a seatbelt)25–35%₪500,000₪325,000–₪375,000Moderate reduction; safety law violation has a significant impact
Driver injured who substantially contributed to the accident40–50%₪500,000₪250,000–₪300,000Substantial reduction; injured party was clearly negligent
Driver injured, but was almost equally responsible as the at-fault party50%₪500,000₪250,000Equal reduction; both parties bear equal responsibility

Important Note: The table above is for illustrative and educational purposes only. Actual compensation depends on the specific facts of the case, the court's assessment, the injured party's age, medical consequences, and additional factors. Each case is unique, and reduction is not automatic.

How to Protect Yourself Against Unfair Claims of Contributory Negligence

If you have been injured in an accident, it is important to know that there are ways to protect yourself against unjustified claims of contributory negligence:

1. Collect Evidence Immediately After the Accident

Take photographs of the accident scene, of the damage to your vehicle, of the road and any relevant detail. If there are witnesses, obtain their contact information. This documentation will be vital to prove that you had no contributory negligence, or that your negligence was minimal.

2. Report to Police and Insurance Immediately

A police report can be a powerful tool in proving your version of events. The defendant's insurance company will see the report, and this can influence its position regarding contributory negligence.

3. Avoid Making Inaccurate Statements

When speaking with the insurance company or with the defendant, be very careful about everything you say. Do not say things like "I think I had a few more seconds to avoid the accident" or "I'm not sure if I saw the other driver". Such statements can be used against you as evidence of contributory negligence.

4. Obtain Expert Opinions

In serious cases, experts (such as a traffic engineer) can prove that it would have been impossible for you to avoid the accident given the road conditions, speed, and reaction time. This can eliminate claims of contributory negligence in part or in whole.

5. Work with an Experienced Attorney

This is the most important step. An attorney experienced in personal injury claims knows how to challenge claims of contributory negligence, how to formulate persuasive arguments, and how to negotiate with insurance companies. Mandelblit, Gor, Witzman-Gor & Co. represents plaintiffs exclusively in personal injury matters, which means all our expertise is dedicated to protecting your rights.

The Impact of Contributory Negligence on Insurance Claims and National Insurance

Contributory negligence does not only affect civil claims in court. It also affects:

Insurance Claims: When you file a claim with the defendant's insurance company, it will consider contributory negligence as part of its risk assessment. If it raises a convincing claim of contributory negligence, it may offer you a lower amount. This is why it is important to be prepared with strong evidence against that claim.

National Insurance: If you receive benefits from the National Insurance for bodily injury, and you have a civil claim, the National Insurance may raise claims of contributory negligence to reduce your entitlement. In some cases, the National Insurance may require a "refund" from the compensation you receive in the claim, based on your percentage of negligence.

Frequently Asked Questions About Contributory Negligence in Personal Injury Claims

Why is it Important to Consult with an Experienced Tort Attorney?

Comparative negligence is one of the most complex issues in tort law. This is not something you should handle alone. The defendant and their insurance company will do everything in their power to argue that you bear significant comparative negligence, in order to reduce your compensation. You need strong legal representation to protect yourself.

Mandelbaum, Gor, Witzman-Gor & Co. Attorneys at Law specializes in representing plaintiffs in tort cases since 2008. We deal with comparative negligence issues every day, and we know how to:

  • Challenge unjustified claims of comparative negligence
  • Present strong evidence proving you bore no comparative negligence, or that it was minimal
  • Conduct effective negotiations with insurance companies
  • Obtain expert opinions when necessary
  • Defend your rights in court

Our first meeting with every plaintiff is free of charge. We will listen to your account, review your evidence, and provide you with direct and honest legal counsel. If you require representation, we will do everything to obtain the full compensation you are entitled to.

Our office is located in Ramat Gan, and we serve plaintiffs from throughout the central region and Israel. If you have been injured in an accident and are concerned about comparative negligence claims, do not wait. Contact us today to schedule your first consultation free of charge.

Summary: Comparative Negligence and Your Rights

Comparative negligence is a legal principle that can significantly impact the compensation you receive in a tort claim. However, this does not mean you must accept unjustified claims of comparative negligence. You are entitled to defend yourself, present evidence, and assert your rights.

Key points to remember:

  • Comparative negligence refers to the plaintiff's fault in causing or aggravating the damage
  • The defendant bears the burden of proof, but you must be prepared to defend yourself
  • The court examines all circumstances of the case to determine the percentage of comparative negligence
  • Strong evidence (photographs, police reports, witness testimony, expert opinions) can eliminate or reduce comparative negligence claims
  • Effective negotiation with insurance companies requires legal knowledge and experience
  • An experienced tort attorney can help you defend your rights and obtain full compensation

If you have been injured in an accident and are concerned about comparative negligence claims, we are here to help. Mandelbaum, Gor, Witzman-Gor & Co. Attorneys at Law represents plaintiffs exclusively in tort cases, and we are committed to protecting your rights. Contact us today to schedule your first consultation free of charge.

Do You Need Legal Counsel on Comparative Negligence?

Mandelbaum, Gor, Witzman-Gor & Co. Attorneys at Law specializes in representing plaintiffs in tort cases. First consultation free of charge.

Leave your details — we’ll get back to you

We’ll respond within 24 hours